[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-794?page=all ]
Rainer Hermanns reassigned WW-794:
----------------------------------
Assign To: Rainer Hermanns
> Issue with ServletDispatcherResponse after a JasperException
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WW-794
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-794
> Project: Struts Action 2
> Type: Improvement
> Components: Dispatch
> Versions: WW 2.1.6, WW 2.1.7
> Reporter: Grégory Joseph
> Assignee: Rainer Hermanns
> Fix For: 2.0
> Attachments: skipPageContext-patch.tgz
>
> Following my thread on
> http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?messageID=8487 , here's patch +
> testcase, in case you guys think the problem is valid.
> I had to resort to jmock-cglib, since I needed to mock the PageContext
> concrete class: you need jmock-1.0.1 , jmock-cglib-1.0.1 , cglib-2.0.2 and
> asm-1.4.3 for it to work.
> // Here's a copy of my original post, for the record:
> I'm having an issue with the ServletDispatcherResult : I have a
> (simplistic) ExceptionInterceptor, which returns ERROR in case in
> catches any Throwable.
> I have a global result for error, mapped to an ErrorAction of ours,
> which currently just logs and returns SUCCESS (the idea being that it's
> going to automatically send a mail to someone, or create a jira bug
> report if appropriate). This in turn has its SUCCESS result mapped to a
> dispatcher for some jsp.
> The problem actually occurs when the original action has a
> JasperException thrown in its dispatched jsp view (currently using
> tomcat 5.5.4) : the ServletDispatcherResult can't dispatch to the
> error.jsp (which is the result of the ErrorAction), because, like jasper
> reports, the Stream is already closed.
> I figured that by removing lines 58-62 from ServletDispatcherResult,
> thing just work as I expect. That is, removing he pageContext.include
> call, and letting my jsp be forwarded instead. Since I'm not sure what
> the intent with pageContext.include is - I've seen an older jira report
> mentionning it (WW-292), I thought it could simply be optional. (i.e,
> adding a setSkipPageContextInclude(boolean skip) in ServletDispatcherResult)
> How does that sound? I'm currently working on a patch for this, but
> PageContext being a concrete class, I needed to use jmock+jmock-cglib
> instead of mockobjects. What do you guys think?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
