On 5/5/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Therefore, I personally consider JSR-168 a big mistake, and I would
prefer it to die peacefully.


Consider the way the world was before JSR-168 happened ... every portal
server had their own completely different API for building portlets, and
bunches of folks who come out the web application world think that "almost
portlet" solutions[1] are enough -- seemingly without caring that they just
added yet another incompatible API to the mix :-)


Michael.


Craig

[1] http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=40274

Reply via email to