On 5/5/06, Jason Carreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's the goal of SAF 2.0?
<
1) Clean up some of the more annoying points of WebWork and XWork but generally have a backward compatible framework that WebWork users can easily jump on to quickly
+1 SAF 2.0 == WW 2.3 I'm still working off the original proposal that specified two phases. * http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsTi The first phase is to bring over WebWork 2.x as is, resolve any licensing issues, package it as an Apache product, include a migration layer for SAF 1 developers, and move toward an initial release. The migration layer may yet include some tools, but, in my mind, the migration layer that matters is the grey matter. (Which is why I've been pouring over the documentation.)
2) Take time to get things right, even if it means backward compatibility and familiarity to WebWork users takes a hit and it takes the WebWork community longer to migrate.
In my mind, this is still Phase 2. This might be SAF 2.1 or SAF 3.0, but it should come after we have done the preliminary work of Phase 1. -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
