thx for the feedback guys. Just to sum up, we'll use WW-1349 - issues related to milestone WW-1340 - javadocs & wiki snippet related (including adding comments and debug statement s in code) Cheers. :-)
----- Original Message ---- From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org> Sent: Thursday, 15 June, 2006 4:57:16 AM Subject: Re: JIRA tickets for each commit (was Re: svn commit: r414249...) How about one for the milestone itself? * http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1349 Though, in the case of SAF 2.0.0, I'd prefer that anything releated to Javadocs or the wiki be related to WW-1340, since there will be more changes than usual. -Ted. On 6/14/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, if we really are going to require a JIRA ticket for each commit, I guess > we'd have to open up a couple general purpose Javadoc/typo fix tickets, as > much > as I hate open ended tickets. > > What do the rest of you think? > > Don --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
