Ok, cool Niall... I guess we maybe need to decide what the "wait point" really is here... do we want to wait for GA before I generate these patches, or just the next release? At first I thought Ted was saying let's wait for GA, but then it sounded like maybe just wait for 1.3.5 (which may or may not be GA of course!). It's cool with me either way, just want to make sure we're all on the same page... no sense in me doing work that will either take a long time to get applied (I'm assuming someone *will* apply them), or possibly have to be re-done anyway because a release or two maybe makes them invalid.
Frank -- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com AIM: fzammetti Yahoo: fzammetti MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Java Web Parts - http://javawebparts.sourceforge.net Supplying the wheel, so you don't have to reinvent it! On Thu, June 15, 2006 11:21 am, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On 6/15/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, June 15, 2006 6:35 am, Ted Husted wrote: >> >> > In the meantime, that would give Frank time to work on those patches. >> >> So you don't want to wait for GA now? That's fine with me... I'm not >> sure >> I can take care of all the complaints by July, but I should be able to >> get >> rid of enough of them to make it worth doing (the two things I mentioned >> the other day would probably cut the numbers in half alone, and they're >> low-hanging fruit I think). > > I'm going to try and find time for 1.3.5 next week - it may not > happen, but if I can then IMO better to leave till after. > > Niall > >> > -Ted. >> >> Frank > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
