I see your concern. I don't use doXXX and extends my custom interceptor off Interceptor interface, so it wouldn't be of any impact to me, but I am not sure about other WebWork users.
Since this is a SAF2 release, I'd prefer to either remove them totally or keep them, rather than marking them as deprecated. Just my 2 cents. What do others think? ----- Original Message ---- From: Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org> Sent: Monday, 19 June, 2006 7:49:40 AM Subject: Re: [action2] Removal of AroundInterceptor and doXXX support from xwork My only concern is WW 2.2 migrations. If it will require them to perform significant work (more than a simple rename), we should just deprecate the feature and perhaps throw a warning. Otherwise, I think we should remove it. Don tm jee wrote: > Hi guys, > > Just want to confirm something. Is it correct to say that we have come to a > conclusion as to remove support of AroundInterceptor and support for doXXX > action method call as a fall back after xXX method is not found? > > If so, we should make the changes towards XWork2 (the XWork CVS Head), am I > right? > > Thanks > > rgds > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
