True, we would have to get the tags to GA before we could really release Struts
Action 2.0 anyways. The other reason to split them off is to make it clear
socially and politically that they are an alternative to JSF tags.
Still, it would be more work, so I'm fine with leaving them as they are as we
certainly have enough to do right now :)
Don
Ted Husted wrote:
If you have the time and inclination to "make it so" over the next
four weeks, you won't get any push-back from me :). Though, I don't
see how we could publish SAF 2.0.0 without bundling the UI Tags and be
able to use it to drive even the example applications.
If we are worried that the AJAX themes might be a hold-up, then
perhaps it may be the AJAX themes that we want to package separately.
Can we treat themes like Maven or Eclipse plugins?
-Ted.
On 6/21/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, I'm thinking splitting off the tags would help us get SAF
2.0.0 out the door sooner. A lot of our remaining tickets are for AJAX
tags, which would be in this new project. As for the Tiles comparison,
that is exactly what I was going for.
And to be clear, the tags, at least for the near term, would stay
dependent on Struts Action 2. The reason to split them off would be to
give them their own release cycle and make Struts Action 2 releases more
focused and quicker. The tags have their own group of interested
committers, so I don't see a repeat of our last spinoff attempt. :)
Don
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
