A thought occured to me today. If we ever want to share code between struts 1 and struts 2c (ie: locale resolution), having the org.apache.struts package structure being the neutral place makes sense, with action (1.x) and action2 (2.x) being specific implementations.
Well, not that the renaming is done, I think we have no normal way of sharing code across packages. Thoughts? -- Paul Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/1/06, Don Brown (JIRA) wrote: > Rename Struts Action 1 to Struts 1 If we are using "struts1" and "struts2" for the repository folders (which is fine with me), why are we using "1.x" and "2.0" for the website folders? * http://struts.apache.org/1.x/ * http://struts.apache.org/2.0/ In the view of "convention over configuration", I feel we we should work toward using a consistent set of conventions across tools. If there is not a technical reason why we need to use symbols, I'd like to use "struts1" and "struts2" for the website folders. -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------- Want to be your own boss? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
