Ted Husted wrote:
I'd really prefer that we use one set of naming conventions. If it's
more typing, then so be it. I've already typed a year's worth of URIs
in this email message :)
My suggestion is that we make it a straight-line correlation
Website
/s/1.x/struts1
/s/2.0/struts2
Repository
/s/apps/struts-apps
...
/s/tiles/struts-tiles
Ok, now you lost me. Are you saying that:
struts.apache.org/1.x -> struts.apache.org/1.x/struts1
struts.apache.org/2.0 > struts.apache.org/2.0/struts2
struts/struts1/apps -> struts/struts1/apps/struts-apps
struts/struts1/tiles -> struts/struts1/tiles/struts-tiles
So basically we'd add an empty directory in all cases? If so, I don't
like that idea because first, I personally don't think the extra
directories is worth it, and second, we finally have the repo and
website fully renamed, and, even if it is imperfect, I think we should
move on. The Subversion repository and website are two different
things, and while we have to do silly naming things to keep Maven happy
in svn, I don't think we should let those hacks leak into our public
website.
Don
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
