I'd prefer to keep them both. ----- Original Message ---- From: Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org> Sent: Friday, 14 July, 2006 1:26:08 AM Subject: Re: [s2] Dojo widgets?
Perhaps I'm reading your reply wrong, but my proposal was to get rid of the Struts calendar and editor tags, since they weren't providing much value. Instead, we'd point users to this new OpenSymphony project if they wanted a fully-featured calendar or editor tag. Do you want to move the calendar and editor UI tags to Opensympyhony, keep the Dojo ones here, or both? Don tm jee wrote: > I like Don's proposal, and would prefer to keep to dojo's calendar, rich text > editor etc. > > rgds > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org> > Sent: Thursday, 13 July, 2006 12:23:34 PM > Subject: Re: [s2] Dojo widgets? > > To kind of answer my own question, I have a proposal: put the original > date picker and rich text editor UI tags in a new OpenSymphony project > titled something like "Struts Optional Components" or perhaps > something more original. Anyways, the point would be to create an > outside ASF project that: > > 1. Provides a home for excellent components that depend on LGPL > Javascript libraries, a no-no for ASF > 2. Shows how easy it is to create your own components and perhaps > fosters a community, much like MyFaces Tomahawk > > Even if we keep Dojo, I think we'd be doing our Webwork users a > disservice to try to get them to use these components instead. There > are just a lot of features the WW ones have that the Dojo ones don't. > Of course it doesn't hurt that the move would close a few of our > tickets and get us that much closer to a stable release :) > > Don > > > > On 7/12/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> We have two UI tags, datePicker and richTextEditor, which used to be >> backed by Javascript libraries, but are now simple wrappers for their >> respective Dojo widgets. In the case of the date picker, I had to >> extend the Dojo widget to have the correct popup behavior we had before. >> >> My question is should I bother aligning the documentation, Javadocs, and >> component classes to the new widgets and their attributes, or are we >> dropping any components that simply wrap Dojo widgets? >> >> I'd like to get this issue resolved so we can move on to the public beta >> phase. Thanks, >> >> Don >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
