[moved from [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 7/14/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/14/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsHaiku > * http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsLimerick I was really tempted to remove these pages ;-)))
Anyone else? IMO they're not hurting anything, and I like them. We used to have fun on Fridays, until it got out of hand.
By the way, any input in these entries: Should they stay, should they go, or at least should they be not referenced from Struts wiki home page?
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsTi
As far as I know, StrutsTi is still in play, there's a "Phase 2" planned after the initial WW -> Struts work. Don?
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/Shale http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsMoreAboutJSF
We're going to have Shale pages on the wiki here, if only for the redirects over to the new pages... and I'd rather not have Shale listed under the heading of "Obsolete and no longer relevant." :) JSF is still a relevant topic for Struts -- there is the Struts Faces library. So no, I don't think we should excise all mention of Shale and JSF from the Struts wiki. There are plenty of "Shale" links that point here, anad I want to make sure people can find their way to its new home if they happen to come here first.
Also, as I understand Struts 2 has wiki at OpenSymphony website. Should http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ be about only Struts 1 or not?
The Struts 2 wiki is in transition so we may have some Struts 2 stuff on the MoinMoin wiki temporarily. After that a link on the FrontPage over to the other wiki should suffice. But I wouldn't ban Struts 2 content from the Moin instance... if someone wants to contribute, and they're more comfortable with this wiki, then it's fine with me. -- Wendy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
