I don't know that I'm comfortable including "bylines" in wiki pages.
The idea behind ASF projects that all resources belong to the group. It's bad form to attribute ownership outside of commit logs. I also feel that it confusing to use personal pronouns in documentation, since *many* people should be maintaining *all* the resources. (There is no "I" in group.) Now, if we are adopting a page from another source, with their permission, it's fine to say something like "This document was originally adopted from ...", as we do in the NOTICE.txt files. But, hopefully, over time, if the project is sucessful, the document will drift and no longer be the work of an individual -Ted. On 7/17/06, Apache Wiki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
New page: By [..]. extracted from [...] Please see [url]http://sourceforge.net/projects/strutsws/ for complete details, but in brief...
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
