Ted Husted wrote:
On 7/18/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I like core better because it fits our naming conventions better and
aligns with
the JSTL convention.
I'd suggest that it aligns a bit too much. If we use "core" in the
URI, there will be a tedency to refer to the "core tags", which will
be confused with the JSTL core tags.
Actually, the "core" is also used by JSF, so I think there is strong precedent.
Still, if you feel strongly about it, I could live with "tags".
There was talk before about calling these critters the "Struts Tags",
so why not go with that?
We talked before about splitting tags into their own module, however, it is one
of those things that may be nice, but no one has thought it important enough to
push the issue or give it a shot.
Don
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
