On 8/24/06, Jason Carreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I disagree here because the URL mapping is more likely to change than the namespace / actionName mapping. Consider if you leave the namespace empty and just give an action name, it will assume the same namespace. Now if you change the namespace for a package of actions, that link still works, but the hardcoded URL one doesn't. Plus, if people are going to be switching to a more RESTful action mapping, URL links will all break, but namespace / actionName links won't.
I agree. Plus, specifiying an action name and namespace makes my code cleaner than constructing a URL manually. I personally don't care what the URL looks like for the most part. Bob
