> > I'm happy to reintroduce a switch, but... > > - It won't be called "compatibility switch", which > implies something else that isn't the root cause for > concern here. > - It will be classified as a "security switch". > - It should be _off_ by default (meaning that it is > the same as WW), considering how widely spread the > usage is and how there is still serious discussion > about even turning it off by default. > > I think that is the only fair outcome. Like I said in > my previous posts, I strongly object to turning it > off by default, as I believe there is a far greater > number of users who rely on it than who avoid it, as > evidenced by these URLs, Hani's recent message, Nick > Hill's comments, and Ian Roughley's comments, as well > as the open issue with the solution for the cancel > button depending on dynamic method invocation via the > "method:" parameter name prefix. > > Is that fair?
I think that's a fair outcome, but those URLs are a spurious argument. That's 2 apps, Jira and Jive, not a majority of all apps. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=41565&messageID=83003#83003 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
