On 8/30/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sure, each of these things, by themselves, could be debated and aren't strictly necessary, but taken as a whole, they represent a significant effort to make development easy. It is that overarching vision that I think we are lacking here, choosing rather to debate all these minor features, which will result in a framework that reflects its confused development.
True. And to alleviate the confusion, we decided on an "overarching vision" that included two phases. Struts 2.0 is phase one. Able is a proposal for phase 2. AFAIK, "Able-style" configuration is still at the handwaving stage. If there is an Able example application available, I'd be happy to review it, so that I can see what we're talking about. In the meantime, let's retain the clear vision that Struts 2.0 is the "compatibility" release, and save the "next generation" configurations for phase 2. -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
