Yeah, my "fix" was to just look for a locally checked out xwork and
include the source in the core's javadocs. The ticket aims for a better
solution that doesn't require a checked out xwork, and will aggregate
javadocs from all the modules.
Don
Ted Husted wrote:
I was thinking that Don knew that, and it had been fixed.
Perhaps I need to update a plugin?
-Ted.
On 9/12/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We have an open ticket on this for Struts 1.3.6. Wendy can explain
better, but the plugin doesn't aggregate correctly. We are waiting for
the next release.
Ted Husted wrote:
> How do we enable the "optional" XWork sources?
>
> It seems to be generating the api docs for XWork but not
aggregating them.
>
> When I run the assembly, the Struts apidocs do not seem to be
aggregated
> either.
>
> -Ted.
>
> On 9/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Author: mrdon
>> Date: Sat Sep 9 23:11:08 2006
>> New Revision: 441917
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=441917
>> Log:
>> Added aggregated Javadoc generation, optionally includes checked out
>> xwork sources
>>
>> WW-1395
>>
>> Modified:
>> struts/struts2/trunk/core/pom.xml
>>
>> Modified: struts/struts2/trunk/core/pom.xml
>> URL:
>>
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/struts2/trunk/core/pom.xml?view=diff&rev=441917&r1=441916&r2=441917
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
