On Oct 10, 2006, at 3:31 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
Last night (I should sleep, I know :-P ) I thought that "named
preparers" could be introduced.
I mean, instead of specifying the prepared class directly, they can
be configured in tiles-defs.xml through a <preparer> element (and
eventually in a <tiles:preparer> tag for page-scoped preparers)
just like definitions are configured, then a "preparer" attribute
could be added to <definition> and <tiles:definition> (and probably
<tiles:insert> too) specifying the name and not the class.
How does it sound to you?
Is there any benefit to this other than not having to type the class
name multiple times? If not, I'm not sure I see a big advantage, but
I'm not against the idea.
Greg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
