Greg Reddin ha scritto:
So are you suggesting we use 2 different tags to insert a definition
as opposed to an attribute? That seems like a good idea.
I added a JIRA issue for that:
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SB-55
Notice that I suggested to split <tiles:insert> into
<tiles:insertDefinition>, <tiles:insertTemplate>, <tiles:insertString>
and <tiles:attribute> but:
* <tiles:insertString> does not make sense IMO, the "string" type has a
meaning only for an attribute whose type is a string: in fact
<tiles:getAsString> would be like <tiles:attribute> forcing the view as
a string. There are better tags to put strings :-)
* <tiles:insertDefinition> and <tiles:insertTemplate> could be a single
<tiles:insert> tag since its management is very similar, or maybe they
could share the same base tag (to avoid code duplication) or,
alternatively, create a utility class to process templates and
definitions not depending on JSP tag libraries (this way it could be
ported also to FreeMarker, I suppose);
* <tiles:attribute> has a different name pattern because I would like to
push the idea of "defining" attributes and not "inserting" them.
What do you think?
Ciao
Antonio
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
