+1 for Beta
-- James Mitchell 678.910.8017 On Oct 20, 2006, at 7:43 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
The Stuts 2.0.1 distribution has been available for over a week. We have a dependency on XWork 2.0.0 beta 1, and it would not be appropriate to mark the Core (and consequently any of the Plugins) "General Availability", but we might at least consider an Alpha or Beta grade. There are no lissues logged against 2.0.1, and the issues logged against 2.0.2 and FUTURE seem to be incremental improvements. The most serious issue seems to be odd caching issues with the FreeMarker templates. * https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1473 There is also an issue with the Tiles TLD's being found, but that is one of our new and experimental plugins. * https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1467 Both cases seems like the type of known issue that could be tolerated in an Alpha or Beta grade release. In the future, we might want to mark some of the plugins a different grade than the core, but for the purposes of this vote, a single grade for the distribution seems appropriate. Of course, if anyone feels differently, please say so in your reply. The ballot is only a convenience. [ ] +1 Alpha grade for 2.0.1 "all" [ ] +1 Beta grade for 2.0.1 "all" [ ] -1 No, let it remain test-build quality. As usual, we welcome votes from all community members. However, only votes from Struts PMC members are binding. -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
