Well, to get it through the Incubator, we simply removed any code who's
copyright couldn't be transfered to the ASF. However, it is my
understanding that an ASF project can include code with another
organizations' copyright and license, as long as we put the license in
the NOTICE.txt file or something like that. If that's the case, we
could probably just bring it back as is.
Anyone know the exact policy of code with another copyright and license
on it?
Don
Konstantin Priblouda wrote:
--- Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I believe the Pico stuff had to be pulled out due to
unclear license
headers in an effort to get the WebWork code through
the Apache
Incubator.
Well, what should be there in the headers then?
As pico commiter I'm open to negotiations ;)
That said, I'd be very open to a pico
container plugin,
similar to the Plexus one. If you create a patch,
I'll apply it :)
Basically it the same stuff that was in WW (for now)
- which was moved to WW codebase from pico/nano so it
could be maintained where it belongs.
( it's better to have nanocontainer compile time
dependency in WW/S2 as other way )
regards,
----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]----------------
Still using XDoclet 1.x? XDoclet 2 is released and of production quality.
check it out: http://xdoclet.codehaus.org
____________________________________________________________________________________
Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business
(http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
