Ya, no matter how much hand waving and documentation you do, if
someone goes to "struts".apache.org to download "tiles", then in
their mind "tiles is part of struts".
Same thing was true for Shale when it was here, which doesn't seem
like a problem any more from what I can tell.
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Nov 9, 2006, at 9:52 AM, David H. DeWolf wrote:
Agreed. This would match our package structure as well.
-D
Greg Reddin wrote:
I think most discussions have leaned towards moving Tiles out of
Struts once it gets ready to graduate from the sandbox. So I'd
prefer Apache Tiles myself. Other thoughts?
Greg
On Nov 9, 2006, at 6:58 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
Hello!
What do you suggest to put in the "NOTICE.txt" file for Tiles 2?
Apache Tiles
or
Apache Struts Tiles
or what else?
Thank you
Antonio
--------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
