No objections here.

Konstantin, I hope you understand that I (and I'm sure others) really appreciate your help. I hate that this is an either/or decision that has to be made and I can't help but feel that you might be let down by our interest in making apt work.



--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017




On Nov 21, 2006, at 2:26 AM, Rene Gielen wrote:

James, Musachy, others,

FYI, I took the ticket. I will take care of the patch and start the xdoctet-tag to annotation conversion this evening, if there are no objections.

Regards,
Rene

The systemPath configuration for the maven plugin
looks similar to
what we have to do for Retrotranslator, I'm wondering
if this is
something we can simply configure in each of our
local settings.xml
and document on the wiki.  That would help me out as
well.  I'll look
into it.

Ted, are you looking at this patch?  I assume you are
running with
it, unless you're tied up.


--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017




On Nov 20, 2006, at 10:40 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:

I attached a patch to WW-1392. It has the changes
to the POMs and
the classes for apt. The namespace  for the apt
stuff is probably
not the best.

musachy

Rainer Hermanns wrote:
Musachy,
can you send me over your tld processor stuff?
Best would be to attach it to the jira ticket
(WW-1392).

tia,
Rainer


After 2 hours trying to make apt run from ant in
a generic way, I
found
out that ant 1.7 has an AptTask. I guess I will
borrow that class
until
struts upgrades to 1.7(RC1 right now).

musachy

Musachy Barroso wrote:

Rene,

Let me know when you get this done, I have apt
ready.

musachy

Rene Gielen wrote:

When we started the taglib generation in ww2,
we had to tweak the
xdoclet templates and a little bit of code
because the meta
information had to be in the component sources
rather than the
Tag-classes. Because of the dual use of the
components (fm-
support),
the real logic sits there while the Tag classes
are simple
wrappers.
Also I remenber there were some small issues
with html artifact
generation. We could not get xdoclet to go
without tweaking it.

Maybe Konstantin could bring some light into
whether standard xd2
taglib doclet would deliver this flexibility.
Also, the idea of
using
real annotations, while doing generation with
xd2, does not sound
that bad, if it would help us to get things out
the door more
quickly.

BTW, I did not find much on apt based tld
generation, too ...

Regards,
Rene



If the xdoclet 2 project already has a taglib
module,
I'd rather use that.  Is there any technical
reason we would
need to
have our own custom taglib generation module?

Don

Konstantin Priblouda wrote:


--- Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Surely, we can't be the first project
interested


in


using annotations to generate taglib tld's?
 Is there any other


solution


out there we can leverage?


Hi Don,  you have several options out of the
box:
1. XD2 has working taglib module, maven2
plugin,


and


fresh version of qdox parser (1.6.1) is said
to


work


with 1.5 sources - just add plugin invocation
to


your


pom.xml

If you like to go for annotations, there is


posibility


to create metadata provider which would pull
the


same


metadata from  annotations instead of @tags
and
utilize the same templates.
regards,

----[ Konstantin Pribluda
http://www.pribluda.de


]----------------


Still using XDoclet 1.x?  XDoclet 2 is
released and


of production quality.


check it out: http://xdoclet.codehaus.org







______________________________________________________
______________________________


Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo!
Mail


beta.


http://new.mail.yahoo.com





------------------------------------------------------
---------------


To unsubscribe, e-mail:


[EMAIL PROTECTED]


For additional commands, e-mail:


[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-----------------------------------------------------
---------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





------------------------------------------------------
------------
---
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?
threadID=49702&messageID=102084#102084




------------------------------------------------------
------------
---
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





------------------------------------------------------
-------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




------------------------------------------------------
--------------
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






------------------------------------------------------
---------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






------------------------------------------------------
---------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



------------------------------------------------------
---------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa? threadID=49702&messageID=102599#102599


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to