David H. DeWolf ha scritto:
What's interesting is that several of the defs actually refer to the
2.0 dtd even though it's using tiles/struts 1.
That was my fault, I replaced all the references from DTD 1.1 to DTD 2.0.
Does everyone agree we should migrate it over to tiles2 and remove all
dependencies on struts?
I don't think anyone is particularly attached to it. It could turn
into tiles-showcase or something else entirely. The documentation is
now on the website (and can be included in the eventual release
distribution) so there's no need to have a webapp called
documentation.
If you have the time and energy to work on it, go right ahead!
Okie. I think Antonio put has been doing some things with it
recently. . .so I'll wait for his response and then move forward.
Well what I have done is not exactly a forward to Tiles 2.0, all the
code of tiles-documentation needs to be translated to work. Now it is
only "correct" in a legal sense, i.e. licenses are put in the correct place.
The problem is that tiles-documentation is made of a tutorial plus live
examples, maybe we should move the static part to xdocs and the dynamic
part to the tiles-test (or showcase).
Ciao
Antonio
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
