and another earlier one on this list: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg20469.html
(not sure that the mail archive got the full thread in this link) On 11/28/06, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
here's one thread on Jakarta general http://www.mail-archive.com/general@jakarta.apache.org/msg12323.html On 11/28/06, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know i'm not really much involved with Tiles lately, but i'd just > like to say that i think the idea of a topic-centered umbrella project > is a bad idea and not especially likely to be favored by the ASF these > days. > > IIRC, the discussions about forming a "Jakarta Web Components" group > were not about forming a new subproject, but were part of Henri's > vision for a flatter, component-centric Jakarta structure that had > quasi-formal "groupings" (which could potentially even overlap) to > conceptually organize the subprojects. It was definitely not planned > that JWC would be a formal subproject containing sub-sub-projects. > > i don't have time to discuss this heavily atm, but i'll try to find > links to the threads in question... > > On 11/28/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Since we've failed to build consensus, I've published a versioned > > > snapshot that will have to suffice for 2.0.2 and I will begin to > > > drive the effort for TLP :( - it's not my preference but it will > > > have to work. > > > > Hang on, slow down just a bit :-) Before we jump off the TLP cliff > > let's make sure we know all the options and have consensus from > > everybody involved. > > > > Here's the viable choices as I see them: > > > > 1) Jakarta Web Components Subproject - What components will make up > > this list? Who all needs to be involved in the discussion? > > 2) Apache Web Components TLP - What components will make up this > > list? Who needs to be involved in the discussion? What's the > > process to proceed? > > 3) Apache Tiles TLP - Seems we could do this here and now and submit > > a proposal to the board. Who else should we bring into the discussion? > > > > Options that have been discussed and rejected: > > > > 1) Struts subproject - Struts does not need to become an umbrella. > > 2) Jakarta Commons component - Tiles is more of a framework than > > most of the components under commons. Several people have voiced > > their objection to this approach. > > 3) Struts2 Tiles Plugin - Removes the "standalone" nature of Tiles. > > > > So... of the three viable options, let's discuss and decide where to > > go from here. > > > > Greg > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
