Where do you think we should put it? a tag? I have no idea. There are also some comments that Don added that we should check out.

"I think this has promise. First, I'd like to see the incoming parameters better integrated into the ActionContext. In particular, the parameters should populate the parameters map in the ActionContext, and OGNL should be used for the Action population rather than by custom means.

Also, it would be interesting to make the result selection happen outside the Action somehow. For example, say you had an Action that returned HTML. It would be interesting to somehow call that Action via Ajax but get JSON back instead, without the Action having to return a different result code. "

Rainer, I'm going to submit my patch for the autocompleter the way it is now, and when we get this done, (if we do) then I will modify the example, sounds good?

regards
musachy

Martin Cooper wrote:
On 11/30/06, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Yeah, they are not tied to ajax at all, so they shouldn't have "ajax" in
the name if that is what you mean, but are you against having a JSON
result type that will take care of the serialization for you?


Yes, I was cringing at the naming with AJAX in there. No, I'm not against
having a JSON result type, but the serialisation code itself should not be buried in there, because people might want to use that for something else (
e.g. embedding some JSON output within generated HTML).

--
Martin Cooper


regards
musachy

Martin Cooper wrote:
> On 11/30/06, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Musachy and others,
>> sounds like we should finally add an AJAXResult...
>> There have been efforts to create an AjaxJSON and AjaxXML result type
>> already.
>
>
> Please, please decouple the notion of rendering / serialising to JSON
and
> XML from "AJAX". They are completely unrelated. Both JSON and XML are
> used
> much more widely than in just AJAX scenarios now.
>
> Also, note that there are lots of JSON serialisers out there. See
> http://json.org/ for a list. The json.org one is also public domain.
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
> So may be we should add this to the core of Struts2 now.
>> Have a look at http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1330 for more
>> details.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> -Rainer
>>
>> > I was finishing the autocompleter examples tonight (annoying patch
>> coming
>> > soon:) ) and I have a couple of questions. The autocompleter when
used
>> in
>> > the "ajax" theme needs the action to return a JSON name/value list,
>> should
>> > we provide any easy way to generate the response from the action? In
>> > showcase I'm using a freemaker template as an example, but that's
>> going
>> to
>> > be a repetitive task for anyone using it.
>> >
>> > The second question is a beginners question, if I'm writing an action
>> that
>> > is going to be used on an ajax request, and I want to write my
>> response
>> > straight to the outputstream, I still need to return an string from
>> > execute,
>> > and I get an error on the server log stating that there is no
"result"
>> > configured, what is the right way of doing this?
>> >
>> > regards
>> > musachy
>> >
>> > --
>> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to