David Durham wrote:
I don't think my first message was clear, and perhaps the problem is
that I really only have a cursory understanding of Struts 2, but my
thinking is that if a configuration file in a Java framework has an
attribute named "class," then that refers to a Java classname, e.g.,
com.dave.MyClass. And, indeed in struts.xml, the class usually does.
<action name="..." class="com.comp.MyAction" />
but in the spring integration it's:
<action name="..." class="SpringBeanName" />
This is great. It works great, SFAIK. I'm saying that perhaps that
shoul be:
<action name="..." class="Spring:SpringBeanName" />
or something like that to kind of indicate to a developer, "Hey, this
isn't a standard java class name."
Good point. I like this idea more because it would allow us to use
multiple object factories simultaneously. You know, you should make an
object factory that parses prefixes to delegate to the proper object
factory... :)
Don
-DAve
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
