The wrappers around the beans are there to provide accessors to new
attributes needed by the ajax tags. If we were to extract the tags into
a separate taglib or library, I don't think we would need the wrappers.
The additionally required attributes would be contained on the new
classes in the new library. This would also remove the dependency of s2
on each ajax library we use (i.e. for dojo we need an additional
attribute x & y, for prototype maybe we use y and add new attributes a & b).
But I like the idea :) It would also help with the more frequent dojo
updates.
/Ian
Ted Husted wrote:
Meanwhile, what about Don's suggestion that we keep the wrappers but
drop the theme and put the tags into their own library or plugin? We'd
need to do something like that first, regardless of where the code
ultimately lives.
-Ted.
On 12/14/06, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Probably a better integration in some places...but it would definitely
be worth considering not to duplicate what others are doing.
musachy
Don Brown wrote:
> Well, if there is an external project that already does everything we
> want, then why don't we just use them? I'm all for minimizing
> duplication. What value does having our own ajax tag library provide?
>
> Don
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
