>From a user's perspective, I am not sure I would like to see the cutoff be any 
>Dojo widget-related tags, for as both Ian and Musachy have pointed out, you 
>are now using dojo across themes and thus one core tag might get the boot in 
>one or more themes due to its dojo javascript library implementation.  

And that, in part, is what I would like to raise as one of your core issues: 
The java script library implementation.  In the current case, you have chosen 
Dojo, a fine choice.  In another dimension, the Struts2 team might have chosen 
prototype/sciptaculous.  In either case, as javascript is required for core 
tags one would expect that you would naturally lever the capabilities of the 
chosen Javascript library.  More importantly, however, we as users of the 
overall framework will be well served by levering the same framework for our 
own ad hoc javascript needs.  My main point here, is if you adopt Dojo as an 
implementation then we as users have a lot to gain by levering the same 
framework. 

I agree with Don, the whole Web 2.0 terminology thing is out of hand and the 
definition of Ajax will change depending on who you ask, but don't let that 
take away from one fundamental truth, users are well served by leveraging 
frameworks like dojo as they attempt to pull the Ajax rabbit out of their 
collective hats.  To that end, I think you have to begin by stating what your 
implementation is.  Once you say, Dojo 0.4, then that choice exists at a level 
above theme and core tags.  Indeed, you might well consider placing your themes 
under an implementation specific directory.  In this way, should Dojo 0.5 
arrive, or you decide to try another library all together, you can organize 
your themes and core tags by the new implementation.  That and now the user has 
an unambiguous understanding of which javascript implementation is available 
for leveraging outside of theme specific core tags..
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=54343&messageID=108942#108942


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to