Yeah, but given the problems that most people have at some stage of
debugging with the tags, I thought there would be more traffic ;-)
/Ian
Mitchell James wrote:
That's the wonderful or terrible thing about successful OSS projects,
you are kidding yourself if you think even 5% of the users are even on
a mailing list, much less that they will read every post.
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Dec 29, 2006, at 8:09 AM, Ian Roughley wrote:
If we go the <dojo:select ... /> from <s:select theme="ajax" ... />
route, then it should be a simple global find and replace.
I am surprised at such a large use of the tags though. I've asked
more than a couple of times if anyone was using them, and there was
never a response.
/Ian
Shekhar Yadav wrote:
We are using 2.0.1 and we are using form/div with ajax based theme. Is
it going to be major problem for us to migrate to new tags. If so what
are you recommendations, we are in process of building and only half
way
through. I don't want to create 250 screens with tags that are going to
be outdated by the time we release the app.
- Shekhar
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Roughley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December
28, 2006 7:36 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: [proposal] Tag reorganization
I'm torn - I like the fact that we are getting the ajax code out of
the base, but especially for webwork->s2 upgrades there is going to
be more work. The other thing is that 2.0.2 is still beta, and
frankly I don't think there is that many people using the tags at
the moment, so this would be a good time to make the change.
/Ian
David H. DeWolf wrote:
That's what I'm imagining too. . .and we're agreeing that this
incompatibility is a pill we have to swallow.
Ian Roughley wrote:
I think I am missing something here - how will the tags be
invoked? It will need to be a new tld with a new name space,
right? Something
like <dojo:select ... /> rather than <s:select theme="ajax" ... />
- so there will be a compatibility issue, but all the
functionality will be moved forward.
/Ian
David H. DeWolf wrote:
Ted Husted wrote:
Don mentioned a separate tag library, so that would indicate
another
prefix, but there'd be no reason why the internal tag syntax would
change.
To keep the codebase manageable, I believe we do need to make this
change, and I'd rather make it now while we are in our first beta
series than after the first Struts 2 GA. The plugin model might
also
open the door to other AJAX implementations of the same tags.
I agree. I like it, but just wanted to make sure we think
through the compatibility changes before we make a decision.
In essence we're saying that this change is more important than
backwards compat of this one tag and we're willing to live with
those repercussions. I'm on board with that.
-T.
On 12/27/06, David H. DeWolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, as long as we keep the tag prefixes and tag names once they
are
abstracted from the plugin.
At one point we talked about having a simple version which is
extended
by the dojo version and added additional (dojo-specific)
featuers. It
seems like the current names would be more likely be used for
the core
tags - not the dojo-enhanced ones.
Ted Husted wrote:
A struts-dojo plugin shouldn't change the tag syntax. It should
just
be a matter of adding the JAR, as we do for Spring, and
JasperReports,
and Tiles, so forth.
On 12/27/06, David H. DeWolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nope, that's the one I'm talking about. I got the impression
we were
going to keep it as is and thus break backwards compatibility
in 2.0.2
-- and then mess with it again it when we create the plugin. .
.
David
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
