Ted Husted wrote:
It would be great if there were a portlet plugin. I have no idea how
the support is implemented, but I expect it would not be that easy. :)
Well, the PortletDispatcher (Jsr168Dispatcher.java) and related portlet
request support classes would probably be easy to separate out. The
trick would be the form and url tags which right now have specific
portlet behavior for building portlet url's. The real question is do we
want separate tags for portlet urls? If so it might be possible to have
a subclass of the url and form tag for portlet environments. If not,
then we'd either have to leave the portlet support in core and only use
it with the portlet plugin--or find some way to override how urls are
build in core via the plugin. These are the issues that I see based on
my limited knowledge of the portlet code.
Tom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
