On 1/15/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/15/07, David H. DeWolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My initial thought was that we wouldn't need the duplicate tiles2 > directory (tiles/trunk would suffice). I would think that a simple parent > pom would suffice for tiles and we may not need a parent and a master. > > I don't really care either way. . .that was just my first thought. We > can always move things around later if needed. Okay, repos/asf/tiles/trunk it is. I'll have time later this afternoon, and will do the svn move then unless someone beats me to it.
I'm cool with this plan. Let's move it first. Then we can decide how to organize it after the fact. Greg
