I disagree; you shouldn't vote beta just because you haven't ran the
code in production. A beta vote should be reserved for the case where
you don't believe the quality is at the level of a GA release, and there
should be specific issues you can point to that you feel need to be
resolved first. If you have downloaded the release, ran it through
whatever tests you deem appropriate, and it passes with flying colors,
then a GA vote is warranted.
Don
Ted Husted wrote:
Beta is also an option :)
On 2/6/07, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+0 for GA. I have some testing code that looks good, but no production
code that has been converted.
/Ian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
