Ted Husted wrote:
If the link is more prominent, then people will
confuse the development builds with alpha or beta releases, which they
are not.
I believe this is untrue. If we were to refactor out the "Test Build"
section onto its own page, and even put a conspicuous disclaimer on the
page "This is not a release!", plus call the link "Test/Unreleased
Builds" on the menu, there would be little or no problem. I don't buy
that you have to bury and obfuscate the builds to ward off accidental
downloads. As far as I am concerned, since I couldn't even find it, that
was personal proof it's hidden beyond reason. I think the current
approach is too conservative to the point of hindering curious
volunteers. Opening it up a little may help, and I would gladly refactor
out the page for you.
My 2 cents.. plus 2 more. :-)
Paul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
