On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was looking at that yesterday and I think it will be big, these are the
imports on Tooltip.js:
dojo.provide("dojo.widget.Tooltip");
dojo.require("dojo.widget.ContentPane");
dojo.require("dojo.widget.PopupContainer");
dojo.require("dojo.uri.Uri");
dojo.require("dojo.widget.*");
dojo.require("dojo.event.*");
dojo.require("dojo.html.style");
dojo.require("dojo.html.util");
dojo.require("dojo.html.iframe");
ContentPane alone is 23K. We can of course build a profile and remove all
the functions that are not needed, but that would take a long time to do.
OK, I just wanted to be sure we weren't overlooking the obvious. That does
look a little hefty for just tooltips. And no, I would not recommend trying
to shrink the size beyond what the Dojo profile mechanism already provides.
--
Martin Cooper
musachy
On 3/16/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3/15/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The ajaxtags are "working"(plenty of stuff to do yet) from the dojo
> > plugin.
> > We need to find something for the tooltips on core, do you guys have
any
> > recommendations?
>
>
> Sorry if this is too obvious, but have we looked at building a custom
> profile of Dojo that includes only the tooltip code? How big would that
> be?
> Or is there another reason we don't want to do that? The fewer external
> code
> bases we need to be familiar with, the better, at least in my book...
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
> I'm looking at this one:
> >
> > http://www.mojavelinux.com/projects/domtooltip/
> >
> > which is under Apache 2.0 license and seems to work fine, compressed
it
> is
> > 25K, which I find still big for just tooltips.
> >
> > musachy
> > --
> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> >
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
