Not sure what the profiler data looks like but if the profiler is indeed
stating that OGNL code is taking the most processor time and it is
indeed 5-10 times slower, than the performance tuning page doesn't look
like it will address these issues. However, it could simply be the
profiler data is actually at a higher level like freemarker or the
result classes and then it might be possible to increase performance.
I'd be interested to see the profiler data to determine where the issue is.
-bp
Ted Husted wrote:
Has anyone rerun these type of benchmarks in light of the performance
tuning page?
* http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/performance-tuning.html
-Ted.
On 12/11/06, dice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
By my own benchmarking I am finding Struts 2 somewhere between 5-10
times
slower than Struts 1 in JSP rendering. JProfiler is telling me OGNL
is the
bottleneck.
I would like to know whether the decision-makers for Struts 2 have
acknowledged its performance problems and if any resolution has been
planned. If so, what timeframe?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
