On 4/17/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/4/17, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> We seem to be getting in a habit of making changes to the 1.3 Branch
> and leaving them out of the trunk. Personally I think this is a bad
> idea...
I agree, every changes, especially bug fixes, should be ported and
tested immediately in the trunk.
> I also think this is the wrong way round - we should be applying
> changes to the trunk and then back-porting them to the 1.3 branch (if
> required). For me the most up to date copy should if possible be the
> trunk and its better to apply and test changes there first.
Here I disagree: if a bug affects a version of the 1.3 branch, the bug
must be fixed in the branch, then verified if in the trunk exists and,
eventually, fix it and test it.
+1 o both. I'll go ahead and merge 1.3's changes onto 1.4 today and
then if people are agreeable we can continue on by applying fixes to
1.3 against 1.4 at the same time, and 1.4 specific things go onto 1.4
and not 1.3.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
