> For the plugins itself: I believe that the spring plugin as well as the > portlet plugin belong (close) to the core, since they are widely used > and , afaik at least for the portlet plugin, actively maintained. Btw, > what are the current issues with spring plugin, if there are?
+1 > > So, why don't we fork off a 0.9 dojo plugin under the proposed struts > external umbrella at google code or sourceforge? I think this would be a > very attractive starting point with the potential to have many > developers involved soon. The 0.4 dojo plugin would stay under the asf > struts umbrella, ensuring people will find what they are known to find. > Maybe we would want to strip it down to a more base functionality then. > Maybe we should also put some thoughts into splitting up UI > functionality integration from the pure AJAX functionalities > integration, regarding dojo encapsulation through the struts framework. > I would agree if it wasn't for the fact of how unstable Dojo is. After seen how many things would just stop working from one minor release to the other I wouldn't want to touch 0.9 for a while. musachy -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
