Kinda of late for this but when I said before that it was a good idea to get this into "core", why I meant was this, to be one of the supported plugins distributed with core and the others.
I'm all +1 for it. musachy On 9/28/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > As Don mentioned, we could also look at a combined Struts JAR which > assembled Struts-Core and the standard plugns (like annotations), into > a single JAR. > > I'd also like to start rolling 2.1.x soon, but I would suggest that > this type of refactoring and API extension could continue in both the > 2.0.x and 2.1.x series, so long as the changes do not remove existing > API signatures that were not deprecated in a prior GA release. > > -Ted. > > On 9/24/07, Brian Pontarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, here's my thought... I think a standard plugin that is part of the main > > distribution might be best. This would contain all standard annotations and > > the main implementation for them. And, as part of the plugin we define good > > extension points to reduce the possible variations, but still allow changes. > > Then if folks want to completely change the conventions, they can create > > their own annotations and plugins and not cause too many conflicts. Also, > > I'd like to possibly pull in some of the JSRs as already mentioned. I think > > the validation annotations and a few of the others warrant some > > investigation. > > > > -bp > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
