Thanks for keeping this going, Don. Decoupling OGNL as you've outlined here and on the XWork Developers Forum is an important step forward. And now that we have an XWork Developers forum, I'll start watching it :)
On 10/2/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm pretty much done, actually. The only other major thing I was > considering, but probably won't get to, was removing commons-logging. > I'll try to spend some time to help close out 2.1 issues. > > Don > > On 10/2/07, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Don is busy with some important refactorings and enhancements for XWork 2.1. > > But I think that until these already commited changes are fully tested and > > stabilized, no xwork 2.1 release will happen. > > > > There are some other open xwork issues, that need to be addressed prior to > > a release. > > > > cheers, > > Rainer > > > > > 2007/9/28, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> > > >> I'd like to propose 7 Oct 2007 as a tag date for the 2.1.0 version. If > > >> anyone would be interested in helping with the build, please don't be > > >> shy! > > > > > > > > > > > > Ted, sincerely I wish to wait until XWork 2.1 is released, so we don't > > > have > > > any snapshot dependency. > > > > > > Antonio --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
