Am Montag, 8. Oktober 2007 21:06:10 schrieb Brian Pontarelli: > Oh, forgot one thing. I like the idea of a single codebehind/zero-conf > plugin that is beta. So, I'm voting that we collapse SU and the code > from struts2 core and the current codebehind plugin into a single > location. This would move all the experimental stuff out of core and > still allow users to start using all the current features as we work on > the others that Ted and others have mentioned (including myself).
+1 for something that can be used by the users (me) easily. I already used SU for a small project and it is just great. But I do not like the situation with struts 2.1 (mainly because SU doesn't work with xwork 2.1). I would try to fix it, but if you merge everything maybe this is useless work. Everything is confusing - codebehind/zero-conf is the "old" plugin, isn't it? Is it better to use SU or codebehind/zero-conf? Choice is good, plugin-hell is not. If you ask me, I would answer that it is best to let SU replace the codebehind/zero-conf thing in s2 (as an official plugin, maybe tagged beta). Piero --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
