I would say that the behavior described is the expected behavior. AFAIK, the @Validation() annotation is just a bit of red-tape, and if we didn't need it, it wouldn't be there at all. Essentially, the @Validation is inherited alongwith the validations. There's another semantic, @SkipValidation, that is intended to suppress inherited validations. (Though, it may still not work quite right.)
-Ted. On Nov 5, 2007 8:51 AM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2292 > > I'm assuming what's happening is that ActionSupport's > validation is enough to use field validator > annotations even if the action doesn't have an > explicit @Validation() annotation (or something else > that leads to the same result). > > WW-2292 basically asks if a lack of @Validation() > should mean no validation based on annotations even if > the class extends ActionSupport. > > Anyone? > > Thanks, > Dave > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- HTH, Ted <http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
