I've contacted Toby to see what he considers the greatest changes he has made to WW recently. Below is the list he replied with.
I have had a crack at WW-1485, which alreadt existed as WW-2294. As it is really more of a XWork issue I have created http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-593 I've ported over the test Toby made as well and all are still passing. If someone could give it a quick look that would be great. There were just a couple of files I was unsure of, and listed on the JIRA issue. WW-1466 (Updgrate Ognl dependency to 2.7 for WebWork 2.2.6 release) // DONE WW-1485 (Parameterizing i18n messages) // WW-2294 + XW-593 WW-1453 (customOnSubmit_parameters​.id() function name cause problem when parameters.id contains forbidden characters) WW-1456 (IE not friendly to SSL headers in JasperReportsResult) WW-1475 (ChainingInterceptor does not properly parse the incoming included or excluded methods) WW-1489 (Handling of unchecked checkboxes) //DONE? ----- Original message ----- From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:40:33 -0500 Subject: Re: Keeping up with Toby :) That would be great, Wes. There's plenty to go around. On Nov 30, 2007 9:21 AM, Wes Wannemacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ted, > > I'd like to take a crack at this one. I am not a committer, but I've > worked in both the s2 and xwork2 codebase. > > -Wes > > > On 11/30/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd also suggest focusing on the 2.1.x head, rather than worrying > > about backporting to the 2.0.x branch, unless of course it's something > > so nasty that we should roll a 2.0.12 release. > > > > We're probably in good shape for 2.1.x. I believe it's mainly a matter > > of catching up on the patches and wrapping up the CodeBehind/SmartURLs > > merger. > > > > -T. > > > > On Nov 30, 2007 8:43 AM, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sure. Just try to see if there is already a matching ticket. Phil > > > created a few during the transition period that might still be open. > > > > > > > > > On Nov 30, 2007 8:15 AM, Martin Gilday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Should we just create a matching Struts 2 JIRA issue, linking to the WW > > > > one and attach the patch there? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original message ----- > > > > From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org> > > > > Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:50:05 -0500 > > > > Subject: Keeping up with Toby :) > > > > > > > > Our good friend Toby (tm_jee) has been closing a lot of tickets on the > > > > WebWork side. I expect that some of these could be ported to Struts 2. > > > > If anyone is looking for an opportunity to learn more about Struts 2, > > > > we could use volunteers to review Toby's WW patches and port them to > > > > S2. Of course, if the volunteer were not a committer, I'd be happy to > > > > apply the patches on this side (though, I can't promise same day > > > > service!). > > > > > > > > -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
