2007/12/17, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 12/17/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mmm I think that you removed Tiles for no good reason.... > > Nope, I just checked - Tiles is still there in -all, -lib, and > -lib-jdk14. You don't need to specify the jar explicitly, as it is > pulled in via the tiles plugin.
The Struts 2/Tiles 2 plugin does not depend on tiles-jsp, so I suppose that it isn't there... BTW, I noticed that you removed the backport-utils and retrotranslator-runtime dependencies: are they still there in backport assemblies? (Sorry for the question but at the moment I cannot test myself). One of the advantages of the plugin system is we don't have to use > optional jars all over the place. It was the optional jars that were > requiring us to declare dependencies in multiple places, but now that > they are required by the plugins, they are properly retrieved with no > extra work. Ok sorry for not understanding... As I said, we'll probably have to add a few back for the couple cases > where the jars were optional and we want them in the zips, but getting > rid of all that duplication will help make the build more maintainable > and less error-prone. I don't like the approach. I think it is best to create assemblies on your local machine by removing all the unneeded dependencies to clean up the pom and the assembly descriptors, until the assemblies are exactly the same as they were before your intervention. After that, we could discuss the removal of dependencies and jars from the distributions. Thanks Antonio
