Chris Pratt wrote:
>
> On Jan 10, 2008 1:15 PM, matt.payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> It would be a ton more useful if it could provide the default class for
>> actions defined in a abstract parent package, where the implementation
>> class
>> for those actions was not specified.
>> (did that make sense)
>>
>> Matt
>>
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by the "abstract parent package", otherwise
> that seems like exactly what it does. If you create a package in
> struts.xml and define the default-class-ref, then create another
> package that extends the first, it should inherit the
> default-class-ref from the parent package.
> (*Chris*)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
My expectation would be that child package would override
"default-class-ref" and have that applied/substituted to the actions defined
in the parent.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/http%3A--struts.apache.org-dtds-struts-2.0.dtd-needs-to-be-updated-tp14742352p14745105.html
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
