So if you wouldn't +1 for a release with no support, then what do you do to
ensure support is available before +1ing?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Antonio Petrelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 8:25 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should voting +1 on a release imply that the vote
intends to help support the release?
2008/1/15, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Why would you vote to release something knowing that once it's out there
may
be nobody to help people with problems?
I wouldn't vote +1 for a release with no support, obviously. But I don't
feel obliged to do anything. My main "moral obligation" is to help the
community to grow.
If a section lacks support, it should be archived, but before we noticed
that it is unsupported, it takes a lot of time: at the same time, we make
release with that stale section without knowing it, in good faith.
And by the way, if every person should help in the section he/she knows, a
"section manager" should be elected: someone that takes responsibility for
the component (in JIRA terms). We have not such a hierarchy, and I don't
think it could be useful.
Antonio
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
