Oh, dang! Forgot to actually change it. On Jan 19, 2008 9:03 PM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (I renamed the subject to attract the attention of any devs who would > > likely have something to say about increasing the size of the distribution, > > > but are probably not following this discussion) > > Looks the same. > > > I could be wrong (it's happened in the past, rarely :) , but that setting > > is not an out-of-the-box configuration. It is simply a default setting > > as to which multipart request impl to use. > > Meh; "default" means "out-of-the-box" to me. > > > If you create a Struts project and you drop in a <s:file> tag so that you > > can have file uploading in your app. To me this means that you have > > "decided" to use File Upload functionality which (again, to me) is the > > same as "deciding" to use jasper reports or "deciding" to use the jsf > > plugin. > > If file uploading required the conscious decision to use a specific plugin, > I'd agree. But it doesn't, as it stands now. The way things stand now (modulo > your new file upload interceptor comment documentation) there's nothing in > the documentation that implies anything special must be done to support a > common-enough usecase. > > > I think the confusion here is because file upload should be pulled into > > it's own plugin. > > That's fine, although I still have to agree with Antonio that uploading a > file is common enough that it *should* work out of the the box without > additional dependencies. Pulling it in to a plugin would at least make it > clear that S2 doesn't support file uploading out of the box. > > > d. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- James Mitchell --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
