It should be converted, if possible, to an abstract class. Interfaces are for defining functionality. Furthermore, interfaces can only be public or package-private. My advice comes from the guy who invented static imports, but I can't reference to you what I read. Sorry!
Paul On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I hadn't even noticed that :) > > musachy > > On Feb 20, 2008 1:48 PM, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > implements vs imports vs static imports > > > > Probably just left over from the pre-j5 era. > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 2008 1:42 PM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ...why *do* we have StrutsStatics as an interface implemented all > over? > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > James Mitchell > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
