*sigh* is this all necessary?  I mean, by using the Maven release
plugin, the binaries are created off the tag.  A quick SVN command can
confirm the tag hasn't been modified, so I don't see any problem with
Jeromy building new binaries and finishing the release.  The vote had
passed with the caveat that the binaries are signed, so if Jeromy
built the same binaries, a new vote would be an exercise in useless
bureaucracy, IMO.

Don

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Jeromy Evans
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wendy Smoak wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Jeromy Evans
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > I've signed struts-annotations-1.0.3 using [EMAIL PROTECTED] and copied
> to
> > > [1].
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Where/how did you sign them?  Were the files re-built?  Generally you
> > only sign what you build yourself, while it's under your control on a
> > machine you trust.
> >
> >
> >
>  Thanks for looking at these Wendy.  It's difficult to step-in part way
> through the process.
>
>  I checked the source out from the struts-annotations-1.03 TAG.
>  I packaged and signed them myself but DID NOT deploy to
> m2-staging-repository as that task was complete already
>  From step 7 of Ref[1], I signed the build artifacts and copied them to
> Ref[2] as per step 8.
>
>  [1]
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Creating+and+Signing+a+Distribution
>  [2] http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/struts-annotations/1.0.3/
>
>
>
> > I'm also not sure how the vote passed, if they were never signed
> originally.
> >
> >
> >
>  I see that you mentioned that during the vote.
>
>
>
> >
> > >  Can some please take a moment to check these?  If they're okay I
> presume
> > > the artefacts then just need to be copied to the right location for
> rsync to
> > > ibiblio.  Any other formalities for struts-annotations?
> > >
> > >  [1] http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/struts-annotations/1.0.3/
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Is this the same as what's in
> >
> http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/struts-annotations/1.0.3/m2-staging-repository/org/apache/struts/struts-annotations/1.0.3/
> > ?
> >
> >
>
>  I think that is a problem isn't it?  The files in the m2-staging-repository
> [3] were built and deployed by Don, not the files I built and signed [2]
>  As the maven artefacts for ibiblio come from m2-staging-repository they'd
> be Don's binaries, not mine. I presume that means the process has to be
> started from scratch unless Don completes as only he can/should sign the
> binaries he created and voters tested?
>
>  [3]
> http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/struts-annotations/1.0.3/m2-staging-repository/org/apache/struts/struts-annotations/1.0.3/
>
>
>
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to