On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [X] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA)
I don't think it is stable enough for a GA (and there are apparent licensing issues I guess), but I think it is good enough to be BETA and to get into our user's hands for more testing. Unless there are huge legal issues or show-stopping stability problems, we need to be getting these releases out to our community or we will never get a GA build. Remember, beta means it is feature complete but there are known issues, and I think that is what we have here. Don o > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user > list. > > Don > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
